This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at
our new wiki
. For more information, see
this blog post about the new governance model
and
this post about changes to the website
.
TWiki
>
Main Web
>
AssetHome
>
AssetMgMeetings
>
AssetMgMeetings25May2011
(25 May 2011,
SheehanAnderson
)
(raw view)
--++ Date: Wednesday, 25 May 2011 Time: 11:00 AM Eastern<br />(contact [[GiliMendel][Gili Mendel]]if you'd like to participate) ---++++ *Agenda* * New Item [[http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/AssetMgSpecificationV2?sortcol=table;table=up;up=#Relation][Asset Relation Resource Definition]]. * Note that the range was removed from a relation * Should the 'relationFrom' and 'relationTo' proerties have ranges of any? * Should we use 'relationFromType' or 'relationType' for the relation type property name? * The relationType 'relationFromName' and 'relationToName' properties are confusing. Would 'relationshipName' and 'reverseRelationshipName' be less confusing? * Should a relation resource have a 'contributor' property? * Which properties should be read only? * Updated Item [[http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/AssetMgSpecificationV2?sortcol=table;table=up#Asset][Asset Resource Definition]]. * The new definition from https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqYtSrbMDDYFdEtlQjhZa09oOWkzSm44LXlyb2lHc3c&hl=en_US#gid=0 has been copied to the wiki * A few changes were made to conform to the CM spec. * The creator and contributor properties now occur zero or more times instead of one or more times. * The creator and contributor now have a range of 'any'. They are not required to be a person. * Should the ras:GUID property be change to ras:guid? This would match the existing formatting for the ras:id property. * New Item [[http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/AssetMgSpecificationV2Samples?sortcol=table;up=#Simple_Relationship_Query_1][Asset Relation Query Examples]]. * For the Simple Relationship Query 1 and 2 examples are the queries in the correct format? * For the Relationship Query with Select example the relationship type description is repeated several times. Is this correct? ---++++ *Notes from Meeting* Minutes * [[http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/AssetMgSpecificationV2?sortcol=table;table=up;up=#Relation][Asset Relation Resource Definition]] * Consider changing the name of the 'Relation' resource to 'RelatedResources' * The relationTo properties in a RelatedResouce may point to different resources * Use the terminology 'source' and 'target' instead of 'from' and 'to' * RelatioinshipType Resource * Example: A 'parent' 'child' relationship type is defined by a single resource * A property on the relationship determines if 'parent' or 'child' is the name of the source Action Items: * Sheehan * Update relatiionshp definitions/examples with proposed changes. ---++++ *Attendees* __IBM__ * Sheehan Anderson * Dave Johnson * Kevin Bauer * Gili Mendel * Harirajan Padmanabhan -- Main.SheehanAnderson - 24 May 2011
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r3
<
r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r3 - 25 May 2011 - 22:08:55 -
SheehanAnderson
Main
Main Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
Sandbox
TWiki
Български
Cesky
Dansk
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
简体中文
簡體中文
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our
Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site?
Send feedback