This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at our new wiki. For more information, see this blog post about the new governance model and this post about changes to the website.
--++ Date: Wednesday, 25 May 2011

Time: 11:00 AM Eastern
(contact Gili Mendelif you'd like to participate)

Agenda

  • New Item Asset Relation Resource Definition.
    • Note that the range was removed from a relation
    • Should the 'relationFrom' and 'relationTo' proerties have ranges of any?
    • Should we use 'relationFromType' or 'relationType' for the relation type property name?
    • The relationType 'relationFromName' and 'relationToName' properties are confusing. Would 'relationshipName' and 'reverseRelationshipName' be less confusing?
    • Should a relation resource have a 'contributor' property?
    • Which properties should be read only?
  • Updated Item Asset Resource Definition.
  • New Item Asset Relation Query Examples.
    • For the Simple Relationship Query 1 and 2 examples are the queries in the correct format?
    • For the Relationship Query with Select example the relationship type description is repeated several times. Is this correct?

Notes from Meeting

Minutes

Action Items:

Attendees

IBM

  • Sheehan Anderson

-- SheehanAnderson - 24 May 2011

Edit | Attach | Print version | History: r3 < r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | Raw edit | More topic actions...
Topic revision: r2 - 25 May 2011 - 14:37:54 - SheehanAnderson
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback