HistoryViewLinks to this page Revision from: 2013 April 16 | 01:56 pm
This is the revision from 2013 April 16 at 01:56 pmView the current live version of the article.

Finding a history of votes in the Mailing List archive is not always easy to do. We surface the results on this page to help with visibility. (Any private votes conducted by email are recorded on the Mailing List Voting Records private page.

New votes are to be added AT THE TOP. (This means that the “Proposal” and “Results” links in the TOC will NOT be stable.)

Contents


Approval of OSLC Reconciliation V2.0 (ACCEPTED)

ACCEPTED, 16 April 2013

Proposal

Excerpt from original email:

I’m requesting on behalf of the Reconciliation Working Group an approval of the OSLC Reconciliation V2 specification to transition to final by email. The Core WG is satisfied with this specification, an Implementation Report is available, and a Test Suite plan is in place.

Results

+1s: Rainer, Andreas, Mik, John

No response (yet): Bola, Dave

Proposal to create an OSLC User Group for Embedded Systems (ACCEPTED)

ACCEPTED, 15 April 2013

Proposal

Excerpt from the charter document (original email):

  • PURPOSE
    • We adopt the broadest scope of Embedded Systems to cover all its application domains & development phases.
    • We recognise, however, the need to split this user group to more focused groups as needs and interests of other OSLC User Groups develop. The scope of this User Group will hence be narrowed down in the course of its initial meetings.
    • In particular, we will align this User Group with the other new ALM/PLM User Group being formed.
    • One of the first activities of the User Group would be to identify use cases and scenarios.
  • FOUNDERS
    • The Royal Institute of Technology - KTH (Prof. Martin Törngren)
    • Siemens Corporate Technology (Rainer Ersch)
    • Atego (Hedley Apperly)
    • Creative Intellect Consulting Ltd (Bola Rotibi)
  • (POTENTIALLY) RELATED OSLC SPECIFICATIONS
    • ALM-PLM Interoperability
    • Architecture Management
    • Automation
    • Change Management
    • Requirements Management

Results

+1s: Rainer, Andreas, Dave, Bola, Mik

No response (yet): John

Approval of OSLC Automation V2.0 (ACCEPTED)

ACCEPTED, 22 January 2013

Proposal

Excerpt from original email:

I am writing to you requesting your approval to transition OSLC Automation 2.0 to final specification phase. The Automation WG has completed the needed requirements (see below), including Core WG review and approval.

Results

+1s: Rainer, Dave, Mik, Andreas, Bola, John

Proposal to approach vendors about OSLC (ACCEPTED)

ACCEPTED, 19 November 2012

Proposal

Excerpt from original email:

  • As already discussed in previous StC meetings, we propose to install a StC focal point for two vendors to begin with
  • The two vendors should be Microsoft (TFS team) and Siemens PL.
  • The StC members being the focal point for these organizations should first approach them informally, but with the clear mandate of the StC to figure out what a next engagement step could be (e.g. a more formal meeting with a StC delegation).
  • The proposal is also that John should be the focal point for Siemens PL and Rainer takes this role for Microsoft.
  • Based on these experiences, we should later decide how useful this approach is and how to continue

Results

+1 : Dave Ingram, Andreas Keis, Rainer Ersch, Mik Kersten, Bola Rotibi,

No response: John Wiegand

Update

11 December 2012, John Wiegand also +1’ed.

Approval of OSLC Asset Management V2.0 (ACCEPTED)

ACCEPTED, 24 September 2012

Proposal

Excerpt from original email:

let us process the request to approve the OSLC Asset Management V2
specification by email instead of having it as an agenda item for the
September meeting

Results

+1: Rainer Ersch, Mik Kersten, John Wiegand, Andreas Keis

No response: Dave Ingram, Bola Rotibi


Category:Reference documents


Categories