HistoryViewLinks to this page Revision from: 2013 January 22 | 09:39 am
This is the revision from 2013 January 22 at 09:39 amView the current live version of the article.

Finding a history of votes in the Mailing List archive is not always easy to do. We surface the results on this page to help with visibility. (Any private votes conducted by email are recorded on the Mailing List Voting Records private page.

New votes are to be added AT THE TOP. (This means that the “Proposal” and “Results” links in the TOC will NOT be stable.)

Contents


Approval of OSLC Automation V2.0 (ACCEPTED)

ACCEPTED, 22 January 2013

Proposal

Excerpt from original email:

I am writing to you requesting your approval to transition OSLC Automation 2.0 to final specification phase. The Automation WG has completed the needed requirements (see below), including Core WG review and approval.

Results

+1s: Rainer, Dave, Mik, Andreas, Bola, John

Proposal to approach vendors about OSLC (ACCEPTED)

ACCEPTED, 19 November 2012

Proposal

Excerpt from original email:

  • As already discussed in previous StC meetings, we propose to install a StC focal point for two vendors to begin with
  • The two vendors should be Microsoft (TFS team) and Siemens PL.
  • The StC members being the focal point for these organizations should first approach them informally, but with the clear mandate of the StC to figure out what a next engagement step could be (e.g. a more formal meeting with a StC delegation).
  • The proposal is also that John should be the focal point for Siemens PL and Rainer takes this role for Microsoft.
  • Based on these experiences, we should later decide how useful this approach is and how to continue

Results

+1 : Dave Ingram, Andreas Keis, Rainer Ersch, Mik Kersten, Bola Rotibi,

No response: John Wiegand

Update

11 December 2012, John Wiegand also +1’ed.

Approval of OSLC Asset Management V2.0 (ACCEPTED)

ACCEPTED, 24 September 2012

Proposal

Excerpt from original email:

let us process the request to approve the OSLC Asset Management V2
specification by email instead of having it as an agenda item for the
September meeting

Results

+1: Rainer Ersch, Mik Kersten, John Wiegand, Andreas Keis

No response: Dave Ingram, Bola Rotibi


Category:Reference documents


Categories