HistoryViewLinks to this page Revision from: 2012 November 20 | 03:22 pm
This is the revision from 2012 November 20 at 03:22 pmView the current live version of the article.

Finding a history of votes in the Mailing List archive is not always easy to do. We surface the results on this page to help with visibility.

New votes are to be added AT THE TOP. (This means that the “Proposal” and “Results” links in the TOC will NOT be stable.)

Contents


Proposal to approach vendors about OSLC

ACCEPTED, 19 November 2012

Proposal

Excerpt from original email:

  • As already discussed in previous StC meetings, we propose to install a StC focal point for two vendors to begin with
  • The two vendors should be Microsoft (TFS team) and Siemens PL.
  • The StC members being the focal point for these organizations should first approach them informally, but with the clear mandate of the StC to figure out what a next engagement step could be (e.g. a more formal meeting with a StC delegation).
  • Our proposal is also that John should be the focal point for Siemens PL and I would take this role for Microsoft.
  • Based on these experiences, we should later decide how useful this approach is and how to continue

Results

+1 : Dave Ingram, Andreas Keis, Rainer Ersch, Mik Kersten, Bola Rotibi,

No response: John Wiegand

Approval of OSLC Asset Management V2.0

ACCEPTED, 24 September 2012

Proposal

Excerpt from original email:

let us process the request to approve the OSLC Asset Management V2
specification by email instead of having it as an agenda item for the
September meeting

Results

+1: Rainer Ersch, Mik Kersten, John Wiegand, Andreas Keis

No response: Dave Ingram, Bola Rotibi


Category:Reference documents


Categories