This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at
our new wiki
. For more information, see
this blog post about the new governance model
and
this post about changes to the website
.
TWiki
>
Main Web
>
AssetHome
>
AssetMgMeetings
>
AssetMgMeetings15Jul2009
(15 Jul 2009,
GrantLarsen
)
(raw view)
---++ Date: Wednesday, 15 July 2009 Time: 8:00 AM Pacific, 11:00 AM Eastern, 5:00 PM Zurich<br />(contact [[GrantLarsen][Grant Larsen]] if you'd like to participate) ---+++ <a name="Agenda"></a><a name="_Agenda_"></a> <a name="Agenda"></a><a name="Agenda_"></a> Agenda: * Discuss completion of to-do items from previous meeting * Discuss scenarios ---++++ *Notes from Meeting* Discussed creating more scenarios in terms of more complex searching and for different types of users, such as architects. Also discussed adding scenarios to address asset governance. The group agreed to write these scenarios down and be prepared for an initial vote on 29 July 2009 regarding scenarios which should be included in version 1 of the REST specification. We discussed that these scenarios as part of the OSLC are focused in integration scenarios and that some scenarios may come up that may not be in that scope but rather may be intended for individual products to implement. As a group we will keep an eye on this to focus on integration scenarios. Some of the governance scenarios we discussed include: * Define review for one or more assets * Initiate asset(s) review * Submit my review of one or more assets * Verify asset(s)' policy compliance * Vote on an asset (approve, reject,...) * Retrieve the current state of one or more assets * Move the asset to another state * Stop (or cancel) asset(s)' review * Retrieve who is responsible for asset(s) in the current state * Retrieve how long have assets been in the current state * Remove/Add user(s) from the review process * Retrieve the assets that I need to review Several to-do items came from this discussion. <strong><font color="orangered">To Do</font></strong> * [<font color="salmon" class="WYSIWYG_COLOR">Randy</font>] Emphasys Group will be writing [[AssetMgScenariosEmphasys][publish, search, retrieve scenarios for Architects]]. * [<font color="salmon" class="WYSIWYG_COLOR">Hari</font>] Hari will be writing [[AssetMgScenariosIRam][asset governance scenarios]]. * [<font color="salmon" class="WYSIWYG_COLOR">All</font>] When writing scenarios, rank them in order of importance from your perspective (1 most impt; 5 least impt). * [<font color="salmon" class="WYSIWYG_COLOR">All</font>] Review scenarios from Randy, Hari, Grant and be prepared to vote on 29 Jul 2009 on which scenarios should be included in version 1 of the REST specification. ---++++ *Attendees* <em><strong>Emphasys Group<br /></strong></em>Randy __IBM__ <br />Samit, Gili, Scott, Hari, Brad, Grant <strong><em><br /></em></strong>
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r1 - 15 Jul 2009 - 16:17:11 -
GrantLarsen
Main
Main Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
Sandbox
TWiki
Български
Cesky
Dansk
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
简体中文
簡體中文
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our
Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site?
Send feedback