Agenda

• Outsdanding Action items:
  • Feedback from JimConallen is oslc.properties being REQUIRED is acceptable to his implementation effort. (Now closed.)
  • IanGreen has completed the RDFS vocabulary and shared this with the community. Recommendation to publish this to open-services.net.
  • IanGreen continued soliciting IP covenant declarations.
• Agree that RDFS vocabulary is ready to publish (see RmSpecificationVocabularyV2)?
• Requirements Organization discussion
  • I'd like us to review Andy's document. In it he makes some assertions - for eample, that a requirement should reference the folder which contains it (should a requirement change when it is moved to another folder?) Should we deal with requirement ordering? For example, how would a Report (via OSLC Reporting) over a specification be possible?