RM workgroup C/ALM review comments

Please add your review comments on the C/ALM scenarios here.

Dominic Tulley: I think it is a weakness of the approach here that the scenarios that "join" RM to other areas are not shared with the other areas. So their scenario for joining with RM may not align well with what we come up with here.

-- RainerE - 29 Jun 2009

comment to Scenario 2

• the expression "Change Request" should be replaced by the expression "Implementation Request"
• the scenario does not explain where this Change Request comes from, except "interested parties".
  From my point of view, it is vital for the OSLC definition, how you communicate with the interested parties
  e.g. verbal, by e-mail, or via an other "system" like a help desk or customer support center