This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at
our new wiki
. For more information, see
this blog post about the new governance model
and
this post about changes to the website
.
TWiki
>
Main Web
>
PerformanceMonitoringHome
>
PmMeetings
>
PmMeetings20120829
(29 Aug 2012,
JulianneBielski
)
(raw view)
-- Main.JulianneBielski - 29 Aug 2012 ---++ Agenda Implementation underway and getting feedback; feeling pressure to close spec so that development can be stabilized and all remaining work known and finite. Review Sample RDF.xml representing a Computer System with a performance monitoring record Questions: - Why do we call PerformanceMonitoringRecord PerformanceMonitoringRecord instead of PerformanceMonitoringResource? - We seem to be putting classes and properties in both the Specification document and the vocabulary document (http://open-services.net/ns/perfmon #). What is the difference? And, do we need to document everything as formal rdfs? For example, imagine this was one of the Performance Monitoring properties: <rdf:Property rdf:about="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title"><br /><rdfs:labelxml:lang="en-US">Title</rdfs:label><br /><rdfs:commentxml:lang="en-US">A name given to the resource.</rdfs:comment> <br /><dc:descriptionxml:lang="en-US">Typically, a Title will be a name by which the <br />resource is formally known.</dc:description><br /><rdfs:isDefinedByrdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" /><br /><dcterms:issued>1999-07-02</dcterms:issued><br /></rdf:Property> - Where should pm:process, pm:monitoringAgent be documented? They're used as a way of relating a computer's processes and agents to classes of Processes and Agents. Is that the standard way of accomplishing this? - Currently we're relating processes, disks, and monitoring agents to ComputerSystems via repeated properties with 'resource' attributes pointing to local URIs. Is there a better way of representing these relationships if we only care about disks, processes, and agents as they pertain to targets of ComputerSystem metrics? - Should we use foaf:Agent class? - How do we properly use string values and enumerated types as metric values, for example to denote Availability Status? ---++ Actions Julie to talk to Janet re: ordering of monitoring agents in computer system resource Update Availability Status definition Ping David Harrison, moving to convergence Make updates based on today's discussion (Julie, John)
Attachments
Attachments
Topic attachments
I
Attachment
Action
Size
Date
Who
Comment
xml
Sample_RDF.xml
manage
15.1 K
29 Aug 2012 - 18:33
JulianneBielski
Sample of
ComputerSystem
?
with
PerformanceMonitoringRecord
?
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r3
<
r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r3 - 29 Aug 2012 - 20:00:24 -
JulianneBielski
Main
Main Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
Sandbox
TWiki
Български
Cesky
Dansk
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
简体中文
簡體中文
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our
Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site?
Send feedback