This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at
our new wiki
. For more information, see
this blog post about the new governance model
and
this post about changes to the website
.
TWiki
>
Main Web
>
OslcCore
>
OslcCoreMeetings
>
OslcCoreMeetings20120111
(11 Jan 2012,
SteveSpeicher
)
(raw view)
---+ OSLC Core Meeting January 11, 2012 [[OslcCoreMeeting20111214][Previous meeting]] Link to OSLC Core spec: OslcCoreSpecification ---++ Meeting logistics How to dial-in to our telecon and login to our screen-sharing session. ---+++ Telecon Info USA Toll-Free: 888-426-6840 USA Caller Paid: 215-861-6239 Participant Code: 3292849 Other numbers: https://www.teleconference.att.com/servlet/glbAccess?process=1&accessCode=3292849&accessNumber=2158616239 ---+++ Online meeting (when we need it) For IBM employees, use the following link: http://w3.ibm.com/collaboration/meeting/join/?schedid=4440645 (IBM intranet authentication required) For people outside IBM, use the following link: http://www.ibm.com/collaboration/meeting/join?id=4440645 ---++ Agenda Review Minutes from [[OslcCoreMeeting20111214][December 14]] OslcCoreSpecificationV2ImplGuidance - created to help collect some needs that don't fit into specs but are useful impl details OslcCoreV2Issues - Outstanding issues and proposed updates * 34: [[http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2011-December/001191.html][Representing the order of triples in a query response that uses oslc.orderBy]] * any addtional feedback? * 35 : [[http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2011-December/001197.html][Buglet in Core 2.0 - non-exemplary(?) use of Change Request]] * Onto issue about [[http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2012-January/001204.html][multi-valued oslc:describes issue]] by JohnArwe Specification Versioning Guidance * [[http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2012-January/001200.html][Proposal sent to oslc-core]] by SteveSpeicher Discussion about requirements for specification authoring - OslcCoreV3Plan 2012 meetings: * Jan 25 - 3.0 progress ---+++ Minutes Review minutes from 12/14 Reviewed intent for OslcCoreSpecificationV2ImplGuidance and request members to contribute and encourage contribution. OslcCoreV2Issues - Outstanding issues and proposed updates * 34: [[http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2011-December/001191.html][Representing the order of triples in a query response that uses oslc.orderBy]] * any addtional feedback? * JohnArwe - talked with implementers to add triples to oslc:ResponseInfo, looking for impl feedback and may not be until March * ArthurRyman - no response received * SteveSpeicher will place resolution on hold waiting for more impl response and feedback. * 35 : [[http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2011-December/001197.html][Buglet in Core 2.0 - non-exemplary(?) use of Change Request]] * [[http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2012-January/001205.html][Proposal for consideration]] by JohnArwe, will consider off line review and revist at next meeting * Agreement it is supposed to be general resource and not Change Request * Onto issue about [[http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2012-January/001204.html][multi-valued oslc:describes issue]] by JohnArwe * Lower bound is 0 since instance shape points to shape and rdf:type is optional * Confirmation that the list of oslc:describes is intended to be the union of all rdfs:Class[es] the shape supports * Arthur is working on defining the semantics of shapes using SPARQL ASK. * Arthur to propose some clarifying text on this. * Question on whether MikeLoeffler has response from 12/6 response Specification Versioning Guidance * [[http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2012-January/001200.html][Proposal sent to oslc-core]] by SteveSpeicher * Concensus on #1 guidance. Ensure workgroups have clear statement on whether there is a previous version. [[http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OslcCoreV3Plan#Specification_requirements][Discussion about requirements for specification authoring]] * No real disagreement on this but not enough time to discuss, taking to the mailing list to discuss 2012 meetings: * Jan 25 - 3.0 progress ---+++ Attendees SteveSpeicher (chair), PaulMcMahan, PaulSlauenwhite, ArthurRyman, MichaelFiedler, DevangParikh, JimConallen, MikeLoeffler, SheehanAnderson, JohnArwe, NickCrossley, DonCronin Did not attend: GrayBachelor, NicholisKruk, DavidHoney, ChrisLazzaro, SofiaYeung, [[RainerE][RainerErsch]], AndyBerner, CharlesRankin, IanGreen
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r3
<
r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r3 - 11 Jan 2012 - 20:04:17 -
SteveSpeicher
Main
Main Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
Sandbox
TWiki
Български
Cesky
Dansk
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
简体中文
簡體中文
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our
Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site?
Send feedback