This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at
our new wiki
. For more information, see
this blog post about the new governance model
and
this post about changes to the website
.
TWiki
>
Main Web
>
OslcCore
>
OslcCoreMeetings
>
OslcCoreMeetings20101006
(06 Oct 2010,
DaveJohnson
)
(raw view)
-- Main.DaveJohnson - 06 Oct 2010 ---+ OSLC Core Meeting October 6, 2010 [[OslcCoreMeetings20100929][Last week's meeting]] ---++ Meeting logistics See the [[OslcCoreMeetings]] for more information, more dial-in numbers and on-line meeting information. * Conference Access * Toll free: 1-866-423-8350 * Toll: 1-719-387-8273 * Participant passcode: 558663 ---++ Agenda * Proposal to add to Appendix A: common properties * =rdfs:member= OSLC domains might define a number of member or contains relationships between resources. The rdfs:member property is suitable for use when only one such relationship needs to be defined, or when no additional semantics need to be implied by the property name. * Arthur R: "As per my action item, I posted some suggestions for what RDF and HTML should be provided for a namespace URI. I created an example for EMS 1.0. It is incomplete at the moment." * [[http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OSLCCoreURINamingGuidance]] * OSLC themes and priorities for 2010 * [[http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2010-October/000597.html]] ---++ Minutes Attendees and notes from the meeting ---+++ Attendees * DaveJohnson * SteveSpeicher * NickCrossley * ScottBosworth * JimConallen * TackTong * IanGreen ---+++ Topics discussed * Discussion: rdfs:member: should we add it to common properties * Dave J: we use rdfs:member in the examples, and now in OSLC-SCM. It should be in Appendix A * Jim C: does this imply some schema meaning that we do not want? * Dave J: no, according to Arthur this is not a problem for rdfs:member * Tack T: doesn't this impact ongoing implementations? * Dave J: no, this should not be a problem, common properties are not required * Nick C: your reporting code require shapes now, so you'll find rdfs:member in shapes and should work fine * Dave J: should we clarify/explain the use of rdfs:member in the XML examples * Ian G: yes, should be specified * AI Dave J: add rdfs:member to common properties * AI Dave J: propose clarification for rdfs:member * Discussion: what RDF or HTML should be returned when a namespace URI is dereferenced * Scott B: Arthur has done quite a bit of work and it looks pretty complete to me * Scott B: He has also provided an XSLT stylesheet to go from RDFS to TWiki syntax * Scott B: I think it needs some more review from this group * AI Everybody: review Arthur's guidelines * OSLC 2011 themes & priorities * Scott Rich comments [[http://open-services.net/pipermail/community_open-services.net/2010-October/000328.html]] * Dave J: overview of specifications needed, does this mean presentation, document, tutorial? * Steve S: could be those things * Dave J: could we reorg the web site start pages to be more friendly * Steve S: we could use role based approach like that at OAuth.net, e.g. are you a provider implementor, or a client author? * Olivier comments [[http://open-services.net/pipermail/community_open-services.net/2010-October/000327.html]] * Dave J: Olivier asks for test suites, open sourced * Ian G: would be nice to have data driven test suites, see http://fitnesse.org/ * Ian G: does it make sense to be an OSLC core consumer? * Jim C: yes, it does. You could create a generic provider * Ian G: right, Tack Tong has written such a provider, but how can you get additional meaning? * Tack T: my work could be a starting point, but we do not do any creation or update * Ian G: would it make sense for a client to advertise itself as a generic client?
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r3
<
r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r3 - 06 Oct 2010 - 15:10:27 -
DaveJohnson
Main
Main Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
Sandbox
TWiki
Български
Cesky
Dansk
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
简体中文
簡體中文
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our
Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site?
Send feedback