This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at
our new wiki
. For more information, see
this blog post about the new governance model
and
this post about changes to the website
.
TWiki
>
Main Web
>
OslcCore
>
OslcCoreMeetings
>
OslcCoreMeetings20100623
(25 Jun 2010,
DaveJohnson
)
(raw view)
---+ OSLC Core Meeting June 23, 2010 ---++ Meeting logistics See the [[OslcCoreMeetings]] for more information, more dial-in numbers and on-line meeting information. * Conference Access * Toll free: 1-866-423-8350 * Toll: 1-719-387-8273 * Participant passcode: 558663 ---++ Agenda * Action items from time taken and corresponding issues resolved * RESOLVED - Common Properties #15 - dcterms * Moved to dcterms * RESOLVED - OSLC Defined Resources # 26 - Value-types, node ID issue * Now have value-types: Resource and Local Resource * Now have representations: Reference and Inline * Now have range column * Now have standard table format in Core spec * RESOLVED - Common Properties #17 - drop oslc:instanceShape * We will keep oslc:instanceShape * RESOLVED - OSLC Defined Resources # 28 - drop notion of extended properties * We will keep extended properties * Open issues * Creation Resources #5 - programmatic id of create, query * Steve's proposal and thread * [[http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2010-June/000313.html]] * Resource Shapes #24 - drop oslc:describes * Only use case comes from reporting, what is it? * Resource Shapes #25 - how to offer / extend resource shapes? * Proposal: expect implementations to provide shapes as required by domain specs * Query Capability #24 - need a query resource definition * Couldn't reach consensus on this without Arthur * Status of Link Guidance - [[http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OSLCCoreLinksDRAFT]] * Link is just a URI reference: unidirectional and may be untyped * Simplified down to three ways to express relationships: Link, Anchor and External Anchor * Removed Common Link Properties because it appears that we may not need them * None are really common * Having them encourages back-links ---++ Minutes Possible Attendees: * NickCrossley * JimConallen * PaulMcMahan * SteveSpeicher Reviewed resolved items Discussed how resource shapes can override OSLC definitions * AI (Dave): draft proposal for how implementation can offer shapes, rules for changing/adding custom properties Discussed fact that extended properties not in OSLC Core spec table * Dave: we expect that very few properties will be extended, so we did not want to devote a column to them. They can be specified elsewhere. Discussed programmatic ID of creation factory * Dave: three ways to specify how creation factory is used: type, usage and shape, do we need guidelines for how they should be used * Jim: have we specified anything that uses these attributes, in the CM2 spec for example? * Steve: not yet AI (Dave): to follow-up with Tack on oslc:describes AI (Dave): follow-up with Arthur on query resource definition Discussed status of Link Guidance. It has been trimmed down a bit, now covers three ways to express relationships: link, anchor and external anchor. There is some contention over how to express link attributes and Jim Conallen is offering a more complex form which he claims has better query characteristics.
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r3
<
r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r3 - 25 Jun 2010 - 17:48:54 -
DaveJohnson
Main
Main Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
Sandbox
TWiki
Български
Cesky
Dansk
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
简体中文
簡體中文
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our
Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site?
Send feedback