OSLC Core Meeting September 7, 2011

Previous meeting

Link to OSLC Core spec: OslcCoreSpecification

Meeting logistics

How to dial-in to our telecon and login to our screen-sharing session.

Telecon Info

USA Toll-Free: 888-426-6840 USA Caller Paid: 215-861-6239 Participant Code: 3292849

Other numbers: https://www.teleconference.att.com/servlet/glbAccess?process=1&accessCode=3292849&accessNumber=2158616239

Online meeting

For IBM employees, use the following link: http://w3.ibm.com/collaboration/meeting/join/?schedid=4440645 (IBM intranet authentication required)

For people outside IBM, use the following link: http://www.ibm.com/collaboration/meeting/join?id=4440645

Agenda

• Workgroup news
  • Automation WG looking to revive in coming months, contact CharlesRankin if interested
  • Communications WG to kick off, contact AndyGurd
• Meeting time change
• 2.0 Issues (still open)
  • encoding of UI preview labels
    • ACTION: Spec is inconsistent, spec is right and example was wrong:
  • json representation ambiguities
    • ACTION: queue up for review at next meeting Sept 21
• Usage of oslc:domain URIs when implementation supports pre-spec or non-domain (generic provider) email thread
• 3.0 content and priorities discussion
  • We'll talk about various priorities for Core 3.0 and OSLC in general. This will mostly be a discussion to review feedback given so far and gather information on priorities.
  • Proposed timetable: convergence draft by 2H2012
  • OslcCoreV3Plan
• Upcoming meetings:
  • Sept 21 - (tentative) PLM WG proposal for general versioning needs
  • Oct 5 - (tentative) Core 3.0 progress

Minutes

Workgroup news:

• • Automation WG looking to revive in coming months, contact CharlesRankin if interested
  • Communications WG to kick off, contact AndyGurd

2.0 Issues discussion:

encoding of UI preview labels

• 4 choices:
  1. redefine its meaning completely in context of XML; con: could be confusing with usage in other specs
  2. say it is really RDF, invent new html data type; con: adds confusion to general
  3. change the name of predicate completely; con: need to migrate to it
  4. do nothing, fix example; con: implementation is harder
  • ACTION: SteveSpeicher to circle with dev teams on impact

• ACTION: queue up for review at next meeting Sept 21

• general feedback
• ACTION: follow up with direction towards new URIs on existing oslc:domain

Upcoming meetings:

Sept 21 - (tentative, most likely will push off to Oct 5th - Steve confirming) PLM WG proposal for general versioning needs

Oct 5 - (tentative) Core 3.0 progress

Attendees

SteveSpeicher (chair)

MikeLoeffler SheehanAnderson MichaelFiedler PaulSlauenwhite JimConallen ArthurRyman PaulMcMahan AndyBerner JohnArwe

probable CharlesRankin