This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at
our new wiki
. For more information, see
this blog post about the new governance model
and
this post about changes to the website
.
Date: Wednesday, 14 September 2011
Time:
12:00 PM
Eastern, 9:00 AM Pacific, 6:00 PM Zurich (contact
SteveSpeicher
if you'd like to participate)
Previous minutes:
CmMeetings20110831
Agenda
Reoccurring agenda items:
Recap of previous meeting
CmMeetings20110831
Community & Implementation updates
Specification Issues Review
CmSpecV2Issues
(6 open as of 5/26)
Main agenda items:
Progress on 3.0 items
Proposed:
state transition
-
AndreWeinand
(review proposal)
Proposed:
priority/severity
-
RobertElves
(review proposal)
Awaiting progress on state transitions
CmScenariosMultiStateQuery
-
BrianSteele
Assigned scenario owners:
ITOpsToDev
-
VijayAggarwal
,
SteveSpeicher
ScenariosMylyn
-
RobertElves
CmScenariosMultiStateQuery
-
BrianSteele
CmScenariosApplicationAnalysisTools
-
SteveSpeicher
CmTaskTracking
-
AndreWeinand
Assigned specification owners
attachments
-
SteveSpeicher
DaveSteinberg
need for OR in query
-
BrianSteele
state transition
-
AndreWeinand
priority/severity
-
RobertElves
Previous Action Items:
VijayAggarwal
to complete list of
ITOpsToDev
scenarios and prioritize
SteveSpeicher
- take feedback from Andre around implementation guidance wiki page, etc
SteveSpeicher
- 2010 / CM 2.0 Retrospective - review action items from last meeting
Next meetings:
Sept 28
Continue with multi-state query, state transition and pri/sev
Minutes
Attendees:
SteveSpeicher
,
SofiaYeung
,
SamPadgett
,
RobertElves
,
AndreWeinand
,
SamitMehta
,
BrianSteele
Regrets:
VijayAggarwal
Reoccurring agenda items:
Recap of previous meeting
CmMeetings20110831
Community & Implementation updates
EclipseCon
?
Europe Nov 2-4 -
SteveSpeicher
- giving mini-OSLC workshop
Specification Issues Review
CmSpecV2Issues
(6 open as of 5/26)
Main agenda items:
Progress on 3.0 items
Review timetable for 3.0 spec
Propose to move CM 3.0 finalization until 2H2012
Proposed:
state transition
-
AndreWeinand
(review proposal)
Need to define well-known state transitions (actions)
What would happen when required fields are missing? Case 2: Delegated UI, Case 1: perhaps have a simpler model for integrations
simplified state model preferred
an advanced option would be to have shapes for actions
ACTION: Need an agreement on right RESTful action model to use
How does the user know the right state/action flow to get to desired state? TBD
Proposed:
priority/severity
-
RobertElves
(review proposal)
Awaiting progress on state transitions
CmScenariosMultiStateQuery
-
BrianSteele
Assigned scenario owners:
ITOpsToDev
-
VijayAggarwal
,
SteveSpeicher
ScenariosMylyn
-
RobertElves
CmScenariosMultiStateQuery
-
BrianSteele
CmScenariosApplicationAnalysisTools
-
SteveSpeicher
CmTaskTracking
-
AndreWeinand
Assigned specification owners
attachments
-
SteveSpeicher
,
DaveSteinberg
need for OR in query
-
BrianSteele
state transition
-
AndreWeinand
priority/severity
-
RobertElves
,
SteveSpeicher
Previous Action Items:
VijayAggarwal
to complete list of
ITOpsToDev
scenarios and prioritize
SteveSpeicher
- take feedback from Andre around implementation guidance wiki page, etc
SteveSpeicher
- 2010 / CM 2.0 Retrospective - review action items from last meeting
Next meetings:
Sept 28
Continue with multi-state query, state transition and pri/sev
update with additional items
This topic: Main
>
WebHome
>
CmHome
>
CmMeetings
>
CmMeetings20110914
Topic revision: r2 - 14 Sep 2011 - 17:26:53 -
SteveSpeicher
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our
Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site?
Send feedback