This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at
our new wiki
. For more information, see
this blog post about the new governance model
and
this post about changes to the website
.
TWiki
>
Main Web
>
CmHome
>
CmMeetings
>
CmMeetings20110216
(16 Feb 2011,
SteveSpeicher
)
(raw view)
---++ Date: Wednesday, 16 Feb 2011 Time: *12:00 PM* Eastern, 9:00 AM Pacific, 6:00 PM Zurich (contact SteveSpeicher if you'd like to participate) Previous minutes: CmMeetings20110202 ---+++ Agenda: * Reoccurring agenda items: * Recap of previous meeting CmMeetings20110202 * Community updates * Implementation updates * Specification Issues Review CmSpecV2Issues * Main agenda items: * 2010 / CM 2.0 Retrospective - review action items from last meeting * Summary: * Overall WG considers things worked well * Would like to see better alignment with something like reference impl / test suite * Better/more examples around how to adopt the spec * Continue to be scenario driven * Proposed actions: * Encourage contribution and development of RI & test suites from WG participants * Work on primer, tutorials, articles to help explain how to adopt the spec * Improve process for out-of-band reviews / decision making * Improve traceability and background of how specification conclusions were reached. * Goal is to finalize catalog of scenarios and prioritize for spec work * Updated scenarios: * ScenariosMylyn - elaborate on attachment needs and what did/didn't make 2.0 * ITOpsToDev - terminology and misc updates * CmScenariosApplicationAnalysisTools - clarified usage of attachments and minimal properties * Progress on CmAttachments scenario elaboration * Identify specification needs/approach to support prioritized scenarios: CmScenarios * 3.0 Themes CmArchitecturalDirectionV3 * Next meetings: * [Mar 2] - Reschedule or new host? ---+++ Minutes Attendees: SteveSpeicher, RobertElves, SofiaYeung, BrianSteele, AndreWeinand, DaveJohnson, SamitMehta, ScottBosworth Regrets: SamLee, SamPadgett * Reoccurring agenda items: * Recap of previous meeting CmMeetings20110202 * Community updates * OSLC talks / demos at IBM Pulse conference in Vegas 2/28-/3/3 * OSLC talks / demos and more expected at IBM Innovate conference in Orlando in June * Implementation updates * DaveJohnson gave update on SORI progress on sourceforge * AndreWeinand gave summary of ongoing progress with RTC 3 fixpack * Specification Issues Review CmSpecV2Issues * Main agenda items: * 2010 / CM 2.0 Retrospective - review action items from last meeting * Summary: * Overall WG considers things worked well * Would like to see better alignment with something like reference impl / test suite * Better/more examples around how to adopt the spec * Continue to be scenario driven * Proposed actions: * Encourage contribution and development of RI & test suites from WG participants * Better issue tracker for open-services.net * Work on primer, tutorials, articles to help explain how to adopt the spec * Improve process for out-of-band reviews / decision making * Improve traceability and background of how specification conclusions were reached. * AndreWeinand - will come back to WG * ScottBosworth - better examples, practical use of shapes, practical use of state predicates * Goal is to elaborate catalog of scenarios and prioritize for spec work * Updated scenarios: * ScenariosMylyn - elaborate on attachment needs and what did/didn't make 2.0 * Need a way to delete attachments * Not necessarily need a way to modify but maybe replace/update and existing file. * CmScenariosApplicationAnalysisTools - clarified usage of attachments and minimal properties * Be good if there was a formatting standard for descriptions, rich text fields. Look to create another standard. * ITOpsToDev - terminology and misc updates * Progress on CmAttachments scenario elaboration * Outlined out it could work based on current implementation restrictions. Next steps to look at alternative approaches and come up with recommendations. * ScottBosworth recommended tracking how [[IndexingProposals][ChangeLog]] may expose itself in a domain spec * Identify specification needs/approach to support prioritized scenarios: CmScenarios * 3.0 Themes CmArchitecturalDirectionV3 * Next meetings: * [[CmMeetings20110309][Mar 9]] - Elaborate on scenarios, identify specification needs (rescheduled from 3/2) * [[CmMeetings20110316][Mar 16]] - Elaborate on scenarios, identify specification needs
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r4
<
r3
<
r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r4 - 16 Feb 2011 - 18:11:21 -
SteveSpeicher
Main
Main Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
Sandbox
TWiki
Български
Cesky
Dansk
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
简体中文
簡體中文
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our
Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site?
Send feedback