This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at our new wiki. For more information, see this blog post about the new governance model and this post about changes to the website.

Date: Wednesday, 16 Feb 2011

Time: 12:00 PM Eastern, 9:00 AM Pacific, 6:00 PM Zurich (contact SteveSpeicher if you'd like to participate)

Previous minutes: CmMeetings20110202

Agenda:

  • Reoccurring agenda items:
  • Main agenda items:
    • 2010 / CM 2.0 Retrospective - review action items from last meeting
      • Summary:
        • Overall WG considers things worked well
        • Would like to see better alignment with something like reference impl / test suite
        • Better/more examples around how to adopt the spec
        • Continue to be scenario driven
      • Proposed actions:
        • Encourage contribution and development of RI & test suites from WG participants
        • Work on primer, tutorials, articles to help explain how to adopt the spec
        • Improve process for out-of-band reviews / decision making
        • Improve traceability and background of how specification conclusions were reached.
    • Goal is to finalize catalog of scenarios and prioritize for spec work
    • Updated scenarios:
    • Progress on CmAttachments scenario elaboration
    • Identify specification needs/approach to support prioritized scenarios: CmScenarios
    • 3.0 Themes CmArchitecturalDirectionV3
  • Next meetings:
    • [Mar 2] - Reschedule or new host?

Minutes

Attendees: SteveSpeicher, RobertElves, SofiaYeung, BrianSteele, AndreWeinand, DaveJohnson, SamitMehta, ScottBosworth

Regrets: SamLee, SamPadgett

  • Reoccurring agenda items:
    • Recap of previous meeting CmMeetings20110202
    • Community updates
      • OSLC talks / demos at IBM Pulse conference in Vegas 2/28-/3/3
      • OSLC talks / demos and more expected at IBM Innovate conference in Orlando in June
    • Implementation updates
      • DaveJohnson gave update on SORI progress on sourceforge
      • AndreWeinand gave summary of ongoing progress with RTC 3 fixpack
    • Specification Issues Review CmSpecV2Issues
  • Main agenda items:
    • 2010 / CM 2.0 Retrospective - review action items from last meeting
      • Summary:
        • Overall WG considers things worked well
        • Would like to see better alignment with something like reference impl / test suite
        • Better/more examples around how to adopt the spec
        • Continue to be scenario driven
      • Proposed actions:
        • Encourage contribution and development of RI & test suites from WG participants
        • Better issue tracker for open-services.net
        • Work on primer, tutorials, articles to help explain how to adopt the spec
        • Improve process for out-of-band reviews / decision making
        • Improve traceability and background of how specification conclusions were reached.
      • AndreWeinand - will come back to WG
      • ScottBosworth - better examples, practical use of shapes, practical use of state predicates
    • Goal is to elaborate catalog of scenarios and prioritize for spec work
    • Updated scenarios:
      • ScenariosMylyn - elaborate on attachment needs and what did/didn't make 2.0 * Need a way to delete attachments * Not necessarily need a way to modify but maybe replace/update and existing file.
      • CmScenariosApplicationAnalysisTools - clarified usage of attachments and minimal properties * Be good if there was a formatting standard for descriptions, rich text fields. Look to create another standard.
      • ITOpsToDev - terminology and misc updates
    • Progress on CmAttachments scenario elaboration * Outlined out it could work based on current implementation restrictions. Next steps to look at alternative approaches and come up with recommendations.
    • ScottBosworth recommended tracking how ChangeLog may expose itself in a domain spec
    • Identify specification needs/approach to support prioritized scenarios: CmScenarios
    • 3.0 Themes CmArchitecturalDirectionV3
  • Next meetings:
    • Mar 9 - Elaborate on scenarios, identify specification needs (rescheduled from 3/2)
    • Mar 16 - Elaborate on scenarios, identify specification needs
Topic revision: r4 - 16 Feb 2011 - 18:11:21 - SteveSpeicher
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback