Date: Wednesday, 16 September 2009

Time: 12:00 PM Eastern, 9:00 AM Pacific, 6:00 PM Zurich
(contact SteveSpeicher if you'd like to participate)

Agenda:

• Call for last minute agenda changes
• Reminder to register for CM-specific mailing list at http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-cm_open-services.net
• Update on outstanding Actions see CmMeetings09022009
• Review ScenariosMylyn and usage with standard ITask interface
• Elaborate on scenarios that can be solved with common vocabularies: CmScenariosReporting and ScenariosMylyn
• Progress on schema variants.
• Progress on 2.0 specs
  • Prioritize scenarios
  • Define scope - CmArchitecturalDirectionV2
  • Milestone plans
  • Progress on extending participation - both as WG participants and implementations
• 1.0 spec maintenance items
  • Feedback from implementations CmImplementationReports
  • CmSpecificationIssueTracking

Minutes

Attendees: SteveSpeicher, AndreWeinand, RobertElves, MikKersten, ScottBosworth, SamLee, MarkRinger, SamitMehta, SteveAbrams, SofiaYeung, DenisTyrell

Regrets: EricSink

• Call for agenda updates
  • MikKersten requests add of Mylyn implementation of CM spec
• Mylyn implementation of CM spec being added to October plan with some core Java API support (OSLC-CM 1.0), filling in gaps for February 2010 with possible 2.0 content as well.
  • Would like to explore the utilityof this in later releases
  • Looking to support delegated Web UI for submissions from Eclipse UI
• Quick introductions, welcoming SofiaYeung and DenisTyrell from Oracle
• RobertElves reviewed ScenariosMylyn ITask interface:
  • ACTION: RobertElves to update
  • There are relationships involved that aren't highlighted here
• ACTION: SteveSpeicher and all to build a table/matrix comparing each tools representation of a ChangeRequest? as well as what type of scenarios they are needed for. Target for contribution by September 28 so it can be combined and review for CmMeetings09302009
  • CmChangeRequestMatrix
• Discussion around integration approaches: UI, fixed vocabularies and meta-data. Consensus in that each scenario may require a different or combined or new approach to integration
  • ACTION: SteveAbrams, ScottBosworth and MarkRinger to draft up details on integration styles
• Next Meeting 30-Sept-2009 12:00 PM Eastern
  • Review mapping of fields from various resource types (task, defect, enhancement) by each WG member's tool/perspective
  • Update on integration styles writeup