This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at
our new wiki
. For more information, see
this blog post about the new governance model
and
this post about changes to the website
.
TWiki
>
Main Web
>
CmHome
>
CmMeetings
>
CmMeetings06102009
(10 Jun 2009,
SteveSpeicher
)
(raw view)
---++ Date: Wednesday, 10 June 2009 Time: 12:00 PM Eastern, 9:00 AM Pacific, 6:00 PM Zurich<br />(contact SteveSpeicher if you'd like to participate) ---+++ Agenda: * Feedback and impressions from Rational Software Conference * Retrospective on 1.0 efforts * 1.0 spec maintenance items * Feedback from implementations CmImplementationReports * Issue tracking * Progress on 2.0 specs * Define scope ---+++ Minutes: Attendees: SteveSpeicher, AndreWeinand, SamitMehta, RobertElves, MikKersten, JayGillibrand, SteveAbrams, RandyVogel Feedback and impressions from Rational Software Conference * SteveAbrams OSLC was very well received across the board * MikKersten also noticed the level of interested in OSLC * RandyVogel many good discussions as well, including business partners * SteveSpeicher witnessed interest at all levels: customers, integrators (other Rational product teams) * AndreWeinand heard about OSLC from many people, were happy to see spec completed and products supporting Retrospective on 1.0 efforts: * MikKersten * Works well: implementations is key in making it all work * Needs improvement: need for reference implementation for service providers, something easier to work with without requiring timely legal approvals, be good to have a task tracker and forum threads * General discussion on involvement with additional implementors and spec involvement: all to take action to pursue this * RandyVogel * Works well: meetings and wikis all went well, as well as level our design feedback, sometimes it went in fair amount detail * SamitMehta * Needs improvement: startup for implementations access is needed, possibly looking at expanding scenarios to get more people involved * ScottBosworth * Works well: implementations working in progress with spec worked well and could * Needs improvement: dealing with maturing as a site, across OSLC: shared components; share more info via group email * AndreWeinand * Works well: echoing previous comments where implementations are key * Needs improvement: areas may be harder to adopt when specifications priorities and scenarios diverge from some product requirements. * RobertElves * Needs improvement: need for a test site (reference implementation) to get access to; better consideration of programatic consumption of the spec; would prefer a non-Web (non-JavaScript) version of the dialogs for consumption in tools like Eclipse * SteveAbrams * Works well: echoing previous comments where implementations are key; scope was key * Needs improvement: could have spent more time to make it simpler; make sure products continue; common concepts challenges * SteveSpeicher * Works well: agreement on spec and impl in parallel * Needs improvement: make sure discussions and work is all on wiki and public Next meeting 24 June 2009 12:00 ET
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r4
<
r3
<
r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r4 - 10 Jun 2009 - 18:40:15 -
SteveSpeicher
Main
Main Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
Sandbox
TWiki
Български
Cesky
Dansk
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
简体中文
簡體中文
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our
Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site?
Send feedback