This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at our new wiki. For more information, see this blog post about the new governance model and this post about changes to the website.
Date: Tuesday, 7 February 2012
Time: 1:00 PM EDT
Contact Gili Mendel if you'd like to participate.

Agenda

  • Combining hardware and software assets
    • Proposals
      • Include additional properties within the asset specification and include an appendix discussing the differences between hardware and software assets
        • Pros: Simple to implement, encourages integration between providers of software and hardware assets
        • Cons: May require providers to handle properties that are not necessary for the type of asset they are managing
      • Create common parent specification (asset management) with child sub-specifications (software assets and hardware assets)
        • Pros: Separates properties that may only be valid for software assets
        • Cons: More difficult to implement, discourages integration between providers that manage software or hardware assets
  • Reducing the number of relationship properties
    • Proposals
      • Only include the dcterms:relation property. Other properties should be included under a non-oslc namespace
      • Reuse properties/namespaces from other specifications

Notes from Meeting

Minutes:

Action Items:

Attendees

IBM

  • Eric Bordeau
  • Gili Mendel
  • Michael Fiedler
  • Sheehan Anderson
  • Sri Gunturi
Edit | Attach | Print version | History: r3 < r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | Raw edit | More topic actions...
Topic revision: r1 - 01 Feb 2012 - 19:32:09 - SheehanAnderson
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback