This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at
our new wiki
. For more information, see
this blog post about the new governance model
and
this post about changes to the website
.
TWiki
>
Main Web
>
AmHome
>
ArchMgmtMeetings
>
ArchMgmtMeetings2Nov2010
(11 Nov 2010,
JimConallen
)
(raw view)
Date: *2 Nov 2010* <br />Time: *7:00 AM Pacific, 10:00 AM Eastern, 3:00 PM UK, 4:00 PM Frankfurt, 5:00 PM Haifa, 7:30 PM Bangalore* <br />Call In Number: (emailed)<br />Participation request: contact JimConallen ---++ Agenda 1 Jim will update workgroup on core activities. 1 Continue discussion of baselines, Tom and Dan B's scenarios. 1 Look at changes to definitions Jim made in response to previous meetings discussions, and documents/images Jim posted [[AMContext][here]]. ---++ Minutes Regrets: Bob Maksimchuk Atendees: Sandeep Kohli, Scott bosworth, Tom Picolli, Dan Leroux, Dan Berg, Clyde Cuspit, Peter Yee, Jim Conallen 1 Sandeep pointed out that so far in our dicusssions of context there is nothing AM specific. Scott pointed out that some of the definitions used by the RM workgroup, for baselines in particular conflict with ours. The RM use of baseline implies that resources in it can change, and that a baseline is more of a container than a frozen set of resources. 1 Tom mentioned we should be able to lock resources. 1 Clyde askd about the lifecycle of a baseline. Jim said that we should try to keep the concept of a baseline (or context in general) simple. 1 Dan L. pointed out that in the AM domain we have a issue with transitive closure. 1 Scott asked if our concept of a baseline or context implied a copy of resources. The team immediately countered that no, something like that is up to the individual service provider, siting System Architect's example of only cpoying when a delta is made as an example. 1 There was some concern about the need to calculate the the resources in a baseline or context. 1 Scott pointed out that the OSLC project context is embedded in a resource definition (service provider property). Should the baselines it is in also be embedded in the resource representation. Most of the team did not like this idea. 1 Scott suggested that we write downt the needs/motivations for this to better understand them.
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r1 - 11 Nov 2010 - 13:47:52 -
JimConallen
Main
Main Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
Sandbox
TWiki
Български
Cesky
Dansk
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
简体中文
簡體中文
Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our
Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site?
Send feedback