This wiki is locked. Future workgroup activity and specification development must take place at our new wiki. For more information, see this blog post about the new governance model and this post about changes to the website.
Date: 29 March 2012
Time: 7:00 AM Pacific, 10:00 AM Eastern, 3:00 PM UK, 4:00 PM Frankfurt, 5:00 PM Haifa, 8:30 PM Bangalore
Call In Number: (emailed)
Participation request: contact JimConallen

Agenda

  1. Updates on Core Activities
  2. Continue discussion on impact analysis scenarios
  3. Discuss link labeling (label, reverse label)

Attendance

Regrets: Steve Speicher

Atendees: Uri Shani, Clyde D. Icuspit, Yuri Yermakov, Suzette Samoojh, Jean-Louis Marechaux, Gary Johnston, Jim Conallen

Minutes

No update on core activities. Jim missed last meeting, no others from core in attendance.

A brief intro to concerns on link labeling. We weel there is a need to explicitly provide a label for a link from both contexts (subject or object). That is, a link in the context of the subject resource may say one thing (i.e. affected by) whereas viewed from the context of the object will say another thing (i.e. affects).

Following up Jean-Louis's suggestion to detail all the types of OSLC resources involved in our impact analysis scenario, and provide concrete examples, we worked on elaborating our example.

See impact analysis scenarios pages for updated content.

Topic revision: r3 - 29 Mar 2012 - 15:10:42 - JimConallen
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Copyright � by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Contributions are governed by our Terms of Use
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback